Search This Blog

03 April 2011

Fla. Senate panel diverts low-cost housing funds

Published: April 1, 2011
Updated: 04/01/2011 06:52 pm

TALLAHASSEE — A proposal that would permanently divert at least $194 million annually in real estate-related taxes from Florida's affordable housing program to general state spending won approval today from the Senate Budget Committee.

The panel also voted to slash health care spending for transplant recipients and other "medically needy" patients with catastrophic illness but who lack sufficient insurance coverage.

Those were among several cost-cutting bills the committee approved that would conform state law to a $69.8 billion budget the panel approved Thursday for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

That sets the stage for floor action in both legislative chambers, which will be followed by negotiations to settle differences in their respective appropriations bills.

Builders, real estate brokers and advocates for low-income people told lawmakers they aren't against shifting documentary stamp taxes levied on mortgages and other transactions from the affordable housing program for one year to help the state overcome an impending $3.75 billion shortfall.

They argued, though, there's no need to make that diversion permanent because the state's economy is sure to rebound.

"You would be making a decision that would be forever," said Jaimie Ross, president of the Florida Housing Coalition.

Committee Chairman JD Alexander responded that overbuilding is a big part of Florida's economic problems and he couldn't envision a need for those funds for at least five more years because the program also gets $1.6 billion annually from the federal government and other sources.

The Lake Wales Republican said shifting the affordable housing money into the general state treasury also may enable the Legislature to reduce some of the cuts planned for other parts of the budget, including health care and a de facto public employee pay cut.

Budget bills that have cleared committees in both chambers would reduce the salaries of teachers, state workers and many local government employees by requiring them to pay 3 percent of their wages into the Florida Retirement System, now fully supported by taxpayers.

The medically needy cutback would stop covering prescription drugs, transportation, hearing aids and glasses effective a year from now, but it would continue paying doctor bills.

Most Republicans but just one Democrat voted for the cut.

Senate Democratic Leader Nan Rich of Weston said the measure would "literally sentence people to death."

Sen. John Thrasher, a Jacksonville Republican and former state GOP chairman, disputed Rich's statement and complained she hadn't made suggestions to cut other spending or raise more money for the state.
Rich responded that she had filed a bill to close corporate tax loopholes but leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature have refused to consider it.

The committee also voted to take more money from state employees' pockets by approving a plan offered by Alexander that would increase their health insurance contributions in many cases.

Alexander estimated it would cost employees up to $50 more a month if they choose a health care plan costing more than the cheapest of six choices the state offers. That's expected to save the state up to $130 million a year.

The bill originally would have increased each employee's costs by up to $8,000 a year by capping the state's contribution at $6,000, but the panel approved Alexander's much more modest substitute proposal.
State employee Jennifer Morgan-Byrd told the committee she couldn't have afforded the original proposal because she makes under $40,000 in the Department of Legal Affairs and is her family's sole financial supporter because her husband stays home with their autistic children.

"It would have been draconian," Alexander told her. "I apologize for scaring you to death."
Alexander said the original proposal resulted from bill drafters' misunderstanding his intent.
The committee split largely along party lines to approve the removal of drug abuse prevention and children's advocacy functions from the governor's office as requested by its new occupant, Republican Gov. Rick Scott.

The Office of Drug Control would go to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the Florida Children's Cabinet would move to the Department of Children and Families.
Sen. Mike Fasano, a New Port Richey Republican who crossed party lines to oppose the drug office shift, complained that FDLE wouldn't get any money to pay for it. He acknowledged the futility of his opposition, though, by noting Scott already has fired the drug office's four employees.

Rich said the Children's Cabinet's has successfully used the influence of the governor's office's to coordinate activities of different agencies affecting children and is considered a national model.

How to Move Your Business to Cloud Computing

Editor's note: Adam Pash is a technology guru and the editor-in-chief of Lifehacker, a popular Website that focuses on technology, productivity, and making your life easier with your computer.

The Internet has changed the way people do nearly everything--from consuming media to performing research to maintaining relationships to communicating.

Its effect on business has been similarly wide ranging. And today, for mission-critical data, Internet-based computing--aka cloud computing--is introducing major changes to the way work is done.

Whether you're ready to move your business operations to the cloud full time or just want to dip a toe in the water vapor, cloud integration offers significant benefits. Specifically:
  • You have access to data that lives in the cloud from any PC, regardless of where you are. All you need is a connection to the Internet and a Web browser.
  • For data in the cloud, companies like Google provide offsite data redundancy that's stronger than the backups most business users have in place. If your hard drive crashes or if your computer vanishes, you don't need to worry that your data has gone missing with it.
With the right tools, you can have your data in the cloud in no time--and it will still play nicely with your desktop, laptop, or smartphone.

Don't Make Me Ditch Microsoft Office!

The Internet has certainly changed the way people work, but desktop applications continue to outperform the Web on a number of fronts--especially in the business world. Fortunately, you can take advantage of the cloud without ditching desktop apps altogether. With the right tools and know-how, you can pair your significant business apps and data with the Web to keep everything in sync, accessible from any browser, and backed up to the cloud.

Note: There are more options for syncing data to the cloud than we can highlight in one article. Our focus here is on some of the most popular and trustworthy options--and in general, that means a large number of Google applications.

Microsoft Office Live

Since businesses tend to create lots of documents, spreadsheets, and presentations, you probably use Microsoft Office regularly. Most Web alternatives still haven't come close to matching the power of the Microsoft Office suite. But you do have a couple of good options for integrating the most popular Office apps with the Web.

Microsoft’s own Office Live Workspace bridges the gap between your favorite Office apps and the Web.Microsoft's own Office Live Workspace service works with Word, Excel, and PowerPoint; it aims to eliminate your need to carry a thumb drive, by letting you to store any of the three types of Office documents on the Live Workspace Website.

When you save a document to Live Workspace, you can view it from any browser, share it with other people in your workspace, and edit it on your desktop with Microsoft Office. The files are stored online on Microsoft's servers, but you can open, edit, and save them with your desktop Office applications just as though they're on your hard drive.

To get started with Live Workspace on your desktop, download Microsoft's Office Live Update for Office.

Google Docs

If you prefer Google Docs (Google's suite of online office applications) to Live Workspace, a couple of tools can help you sync your desktop Office apps with Google Docs.

Easily access and edit any Word, Excel, or PowerPoint document from your desktop or from Google Docs with Memeo Connect.The first, Memeo Connect, syncs any document between your desktop and Google Docs. You can choose to edit the documents locally in Office or online in Google Docs; either way, Memeo Connect will keep your local Office documents constantly in sync with Google Docs.
If you do a lot of collaboration, a better option may be OffiSync. Once installed, OffiSync works much like Memeo Connect, allowing you to view and edit any document on your desktop or within Google Docs.

OffiSync pays a little more attention to collaboration, so users can work on the same document at the same time, and any changes that one user saves will instantly merge with the version of the document that the other user has open.

A Calendar in the Cloud

A desktop calendar helps you schedule your appointments, remember important events, and keep your life in order--as long as you're in front of your PC.

A calendar that syncs to the cloud ensures that you'll always have access to your schedule. It can sync wirelessly to your smartphone, and will keep your entire schedule flawlessly in sync.

To handle the job, look no further than Google Calendar and the Google Calendar Sync plug-in for Microsoft Outlook. Once installed, the calendar can perform seamless two-way synchronization between your desktop Outlook calendar and Google Calendar.

Bonus for your phone: If you have a BlackBerry, iPhone, Nokia S60, or Windows phone, Google Sync for your phone wirelessly syncs your calendar with your device so you can check your schedule on the go, add an appointment, and rest assured that the next time you sit down at your computer, your calendar will be in perfect sync.

Contacts in the Cloud

Your contacts are the lifeblood of your business, so making sure they're always backed up, accessible from anywhere, and up-to-date is incredibly important.

If you shell out for the Google Apps Premier Edition not a bad idea if you're serious about syncing your data with Google's cloud), you also gain access to Google Apps Sync for Microsoft Outlook--a tool that deftly handles syncing of your contacts between Outlook and Google Contacts. (Unfortunately, Google supports contact sync with Outlook only with Premier accounts.)

If you don't want to commit to Google Apps Premier but you'd like to sync your Google Contacts with your Outlook contacts, check out GO Contact Sync. Want to try a non-Google app? Plaxo is an excellent online contact management service that syncs with Outlook like a charm.

Bonus for your phone: Google Contacts, like Google Calendar, syncs seamlessly with BlackBerry, iPhone, Nokia S60, and Windows phones.

Google Sync for your phone is particularly handy with contacts, especially if you often add new contacts from your phone: Transfer a contact from your phone, and Google Sync will wirelessly sync to the cloud and then back to your desktop.

Syncing Files and Folders to the Cloud

If you're not especially concerned about creating or editing files online, you may prefer to use a file-syncing application such as Dropbox or SugarSync to sync your documents to the cloud.
After installing one of these utilities on your computer, you can instantly sync and back up any file between the cloud and any computer that has the app installed on it. Thereafter, anything you add to a synced folder syncs between the Web and every desktop where you've installed it.

E-Mail in the Cloud

E-mail is exceedingly important to any business, but syncing e-mail between your desktop and the Web--whether via your company's e-mail server or a cloud service like Gmail--isn't exactly new.

If you use Gmail or Google Apps, we recommend setting up Gmail's IMAP with your desktop e-mail client to keep your desktop client and your Gmail inbox in perfect sync. (To enable IMAP in Gmail, log in and visit the Forwarding and POP/IMAP page.)

Once you've set up Gmail IMAP on your desktop, your desktop e-mail client of choice will always be in perfect sync with Gmail in your browser

Five Ways to Re-Energize Sales

, On Thursday March 31, 2011, 7:36 am EDT

I'm a firm believer that businesses must always grow or face extinction. So, early last year when my business -- which specializes in producing short promotional videos known as "sizzle reels" -- was seeing high levels of return business but not much in the way of new customer acquisition, I immediately set out to make some big changes.

Over the next 30 days, my sales team and I conducted a full assessment of the sales operation -- everything from lead generation through the point of sale -- with the goal of improving new client acquisition. After careful analysis, we came up with a five-point game plan that helped to significantly improve revenues in less than six months.

Here are the five steps we came up with, as well as some of the lessons we learned along the way.

1. Instruct the sales team to operate with a 2-for-1 mindset. Whenever we sold a new client we encouraged our team to turn that one client into two. We created a program that gave free gift cards and catered breakfasts to clients who gave us referrals. Not long after, our business's bottom lined surged without having to spend a dime on lead generation. Today, most of our clients have morphed into as many as four new clients. For every $250 we've spent on referrals, we've received an average of $4,000 in gross sales.


2. Adjust our keyword strategy based on client feedback. Over many lunches, conference calls and email exchanges, we asked our clients to tell us what they thought about our service, where they heard about us and why they hired us. The most telling thing we learned was that most of our clients found us online but rarely by using any of our traditional keywords. Some were minor differences (while we were already using the phrase "sizzle reels," we found that "sizzle reel," the singular form, generated 10 to 15 times more interest). In other instances, our clients were using keywords we hadn't even considered.

This led us to the conclusion that how we defined our product and how our clients defined our product were on two separate wavelengths. Adjusting our pay per click and organic search engine optimization strategies increased our online traffic by nearly 100% in a single month.

It also helped fortify our market position online. Based on the keywords our clients suggested to us, we bought up several keyword-rich URLs, for anywhere from $100 to $4,000 per URL. After reviewing a year's worth of Google analytics, we realized that buying these "hot ticket" URLs and turning them into highly-optimized landing pages was helping us to build our search engine rankings while also locking out the competition.


3. Simplify the information-gathering process. Client feedback also taught us that they didn't want to call us or send an email through our general inquiry address because they didn't know what to ask in order to get a quote. In response, we added a "request a quote" page which asks customers to answer questions we think they might ask us in order to get a quote. This way, we can collect everything we need to provide them with an accurate quote without needing to have an actual conversation. The page cost $100 to build and helped us book $15,000 in new business in just the first week it went live on our site.


4. Compute in the cloud. Moving our company's operations online not only helped us provide information to customers quicker and close deals faster, it also slashed our overhead expenses by $2,500 a month on average. We were able to develop a much leaner, more efficient selling system by using online tools such as SlideRocket.com and Proposable.com -- both of which offered us instant access to our most updated documents and real-time viewing analytics for our proposals and presentations -- and others such as Freshbooks.com, Box.net and Google Docs.


5. Use testimonials to build our reputation. We were fortunate to have a roster packed with name-recognizable clients including Old Spice, Pampers and Gap. We needed to reach out to several of our clients for testimonials, which we could then use to sell new clients. We collected those testimonials and display them on all sales materials and online. While we can't put an exact dollar amount on what this tactic generated revenue-wise, it is clear that it has made it much easier for our sales people to close sales. Big names equal instant credibility.

Has the Residential Real Estate Market Bottomed Out?

, On Sunday April 3, 2011, 7:00 am EDT

Whether you consider your home an investment, real estate is still a big part of many individuals' financial lives. Although home equity levels have dropped substantially amid the housing bust, home ownership remains a substantial component of net worth in many households. And even for those who no longer have mortgages, property taxes and housing-related upkeep are often some of the largest line items in household budgets.

To get a sense of whether property prices in various parts of the country were trending up, down, or sideways, I recently turned to Morningstar.com users for their take, posting a query on the Personal Finance forum of Morningstar.com's Discuss boards. I also asked them to share thoughts on whether the housing market had affected their personal real estate strategies. Were they waiting for prices to rebound before selling? Had they found attractive bargains amid the wreckage? To read the complete thread featuring views from across the country, click here.

"No Good News"
Judging from the downbeat sentiment of many posts in the thread, those who have been anxiously awaiting a recovery will have to keep on waiting.

Poster pquilici summed up the case for staying depressed with this post: "I live in Skokie, Ill., and nothing but uncertainty rules the residential market. Short sales and foreclosures dominate the sales. Prices seem to have a continued downward bias. A potential market killer is increased property taxes to fund teachers' pensions. Lousy weather. Irresponsible government. No good jobs. No good news."

Grasshopper joined the doom squad with this post. "My opinion: Homes will lose value every year for at least the next 10 years. You do not live in a bank or stock portfolio in a bull market. You live in a depreciating asset that costs more and more money to upkeep. Burdensome taxes, jobs that do not pay a living wage, and so on. Oh, the weather is lousy too!"

Kayaker astutely noted that ongoing housing-market weakness has exacted an emotional toll as well as a financial one: "I live in a gated golf community in coastal South Carolina. Like everywhere else, housing prices have gone down at least 25% to 30%. Some homes here that are 15 to 20 years old have sold for incredibly low prices (40% less than original asking) because elderly owners did not keep them up to date and would not lower their price to compensate; grown kids inherited them and dumped them quickly. New owners have gotten very good bargains and these homes have gone quickly. Fallout has been a small group of people who are angry at everything and everyone in this close-knit community. Whether housing, their investments, familywide financial issues, or a combination, the financial crisis has taken a big emotional toll on a number of retired people in this community."

Edit, like pquilici, groused about the combination of diminished property values and higher taxes. "I view the housing market in our area as being depressed, but at the same time our assessors are increasing the property values to pay the ever increasing burden of government funding."

Jpluther, whose home market of Silicon Valley has been relatively unaffected by the housing bust, thinks a bubble could yet burst there: "Housing prices [in Silicon Valley] are still completely insane when viewed in terms of rental potential or in terms of median price versus median income. Although we have seen smallish declines, I believe we are still midbubble unless the economy and wages take off in an unexpected manner. A 30% fall from current values would not surprise me at all."

The Best-Laid Plans
Several users noted that the ongoing housing bust had affected their own plans to relocate. Latitudes wrote, "About 16 months ago, I thought I was being very smart in buying a new condo in Orlando, Fla., at what I felt was a significantly reduced price, more than 40% below the asking price and about 10% less than the original buyer had paid two years prior. My thinking was with such a good deal on the 'buy side,' I could then market my current (and much larger) single-family house for up to two years and still come out ahead.

"Well, those 24 months are quickly ticking by and despite the fact that I have priced my house competitively in relative terms (and reduced the price three times), I have only had one ridiculous lowball offer in the last year and half. Lots of showings, lots of positive feedback, but everyone still seems to be looking for a deal (that is, a steal). I don't think the Orlando real estate market (much less the rest of Florida) is seeing much recovery yet. With an overabundance of foreclosures and short sales still in inventory, I just may be watching a well-thought-out plan turn sour."

DebbieTrice is also downbeat about the Florida market, noting that Sarasota, Fla., remains hard-hit and could well stay that way, in her view: "Due to a combination of fraud and rampant speculation, more housing units were built at ever-increasing prices in Sarasota during the boom than could have been absorbed in a reasonable time frame. The bust has further increased the unsold inventory because now-unemployed construction workers have moved away. And, of course, foreclosures and short sales on the market have depressed prices even more. This is one of the worst housing markets in the United States, and I suspect it will get worse before it gets better. My guess is the local market will return to normal about two years after baby boomer retirees feel flush enough to buy second homes in Florida. I am one of those boomer retirees who had planned to downsize, but I won't put my house on the market while it has to compete with foreclosures."

Other users echoed Debbie's sentiment, noting that they'll hold off on listing their homes until they see a rebound. Poster Chamois wrote, "I am delaying a move to a retirement community until values recover, but I am in no hurry anyway."

Ditto for wwgman, who notes that the Phoenix market remains in bad shape. "I am holding off selling and buying another home until the market bottoms."

Bargain-Shoppers Holding Off, Sellers Unrealistic?
The sentiment among would-be buyers, meanwhile, corroborates that the worst may not be over in some markets. They're looking for bargains that haven't yet materialized.

Poster Edmund_Dantes, for example, would like to purchase a beach vacation home in Southern California but is waiting for even lower prices before making a move. "Lots of inventory out there. I intend to only submit low-ball offers. Sellers can take it or leave my offer. If they leave it, I will just move on to the next property. Frankly, I am hoping for further weakness for my purchase. My biggest concern is if interest rates surge before I can find a property and lock in a rate. In that eventuality, my offer prices will drop accordingly."

He's also concerned about bidding on homes in a market littered with short sales. "Lots of properties on the market are short sales, wherein the bank allows the deadbeat to continue to reside in the property, without paying their mortgage, until the property is sold. My experience with these [is that] sellers have every incentive to delay sales (including not making the property available for viewing), so they can continue to live rent-free. An additional problem with short sales: The seller's bank can take their time in deciding to accept or reject an offer. These properties are thus very inefficient to close/buy. On a macroeconomic level, I suspect this will contribute to property markets taking longer to clear inventory and stabilize prices."

Jadster, meanwhile, is trolling for bargains in the Denver area but hasn't yet found prices low enough for his taste. "Housing is still not cheap overall, but I'd buy now if I saw a good opportunity. We have placed some low-ball offers and been rebuffed, so we just move on to the next one. It's a buyer's market, and as unemployment and foreclosure issues linger, it should remain so for a while. One example: An older fellow overpriced his house at $400,000, dropped it to $380,000 after a few weeks, then dropped it to $365,000 after another month. It's still on the market."

Poster Fitness has also observed unrealistic sellers in the Denver market: "(I) notice that many homes that are selling are decreasing their prices. Some are less than the prices of 2005 and other homeowners are still unrealistic and have not come to terms that this is not the same housing market of just a few years ago. If Fannie Mae (OTC BB:FNMA.OB - News) and Freddie Mac (OTC BB:FMCC.OB - News) tighten the lending standards even further, the housing market in my opinion will drop faster and further. People with cash and large down payments may be the beneficiaries, and everyone else may be unable to purchase at this time."

Olddude echoed the view that some would-be sellers are being stubborn about their asking prices, anchoring on bubble-time prices. "My take on the housing market? The place we want to retire to, the Catalina Foothills outside of Tucson, Ariz., is still one of the most expensive places in the U.S. Most of the desirable homes have been pulled from the market and the homeowners are waiting for a hoped-for recovery. They might die waiting to sell and ditto for me waiting to purchase."

TOOOINTENSE is another would-be buyer who's encountering still-high prices where he lives and works, Nashville, Tenn. "I have looked at purchasing several properties that are in need of light to moderate repair as investments (I am in construction), and none has panned out. The banks are trying to hold out for as much recoup as possible, naturally, but won't bite on cash offers. Individuals are still in a housing-bubble daze and are staying put or not considering any price reduction. Foreclosures have moderated, but I feel that prices are still too high."

WesternMass pointed to a similar phenomenon in his home market, noting that stringent lending standards have contributed to the malaise. "I have been flipping select single-family homes in western Massachusetts for some 20 years. Current pricing is flat, and home inventory for sale is low for this time of year. Even distressed homes are not showing up on the market. We have three 'Over 55' communities already approved for construction; however, only one has been built so far and sale of individual units has been slow. The other two projects are on hold until the market starts improving. Seems everyone is sitting on their property until the market improves. The other problem is availability of financing. Local banks and national banks have become very cautious in their lending practices. You need a credit score of 700-plus and have to undertake a tremendous amount of paperwork and close scrutiny to secure financing."
BuyerBeWare in Virginia Beach, Va., notes that sellers who hold out for their price may be pennywise and pound-foolish. "Most people who want to sell are hanging on to houses and refusing to price properties to sell. They do not want to sell at a loss even though three to five years from now they will sell at a greater loss. They will also lose all the taxes, maintenance, interest payments to the banks, and other expenses they spent during that three- to five-year time frame."

Not All Doomsaying
Yet as pessimistic as some posters were about the headwinds facing the housing market, a handful believe that residential real estate in their community is close to bottoming, if not already on an upswing.

Kayaker, in South Carolina, noted that, "This winter and spring, real estate sales activity is up quite a bit here versus in 2010; nice houses at reasonable (not fire-sale) prices are selling here now, which was not the case in 2009 to 2010."

RTO31607, meanwhile, is seeing signs of stabilization in the Highlands Ranch area of Denver. "From high to low here, prices went down about 15%. They have recovered by a couple of percentage points since the low last year. Some houses are moving; this is a desirable area in which to live. There's not a lot of action, but there's some."

MrGolf noted, "Prices here in my Sarasota neighborhood seem to be flattening after two years of steep drops."

Bitsotree observed that the high-end residential market in Boston is just fine, thank you very much. "In

Boston, things are rosy, for the super-rich anyway. In the posh Back Bay neighborhood, there are about 20 condo buildings undergoing complete restorations. If the price of copper is up, it sure isn't affecting any budgets here. Copper gutters, copper down spouts, copper roof trim. Lavish brick work, lush landscaping, designer windows, and I heard one place was installing a bowling alley for the children. It is obscene but a good example of the trickle-down effect in action; this neighborhood is swarming with carpenters, plumbers, electricians, architects, decorators, and so on. Sooner or later, those people will all have enough money to spend on their own homes."

Cincinnatikid, meanwhile, isn't getting too concerned about the macroeconomic housing climate and is instead letting his own wishes dictate the next steps. "My wife and I are investing in our place--a kitchen and new master bath. We know that we'll probably not get our money back, but we're enjoying our house more."

Administration approves bailout pay packages

 
, On Friday April 1, 2011, 8:49 pm EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The four companies still receiving the largest amounts of government bailout aid won't be able to raise the amount of cash they pay out to their top executives this year, the administration's pay czar has ruled.

The decisions, released late Friday, cover 2011 compensation for the top 25 executives at General Motors Co., Chrysler, American International Group Inc. and Ally Financial Inc., the former financing arm of GM. The rulings clear the way for millions of dollars in salary and bonuses to be paid out by companies that are still repaying the billions in aid they received during the financial crisis from the government's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program.

While the companies can't give cash raises, they are being allowed to boost the value of deferred stock awards to their executives. The Treasury Department defended that decision, saying it is in line with pay guidelines that it used to make compensation decisions in 2009 and 2010.

The government's findings do not identify the executives by name but only by salary rankings.

The highest-paid executive at insurance giant AIG will receive total compensation of $10.5 million in 2011, including a $3 million salary, the largest of any of the pay packages approved Friday by the pay czar. AIG confirmed in a filing with regulators Friday that President and CEO Robert Benmosche's pay will stand at $10.5 million this year, the same package he received in 2010.

GM's highest-paid executive will receive $1.7 million in salary for 2011 and performance-based stock awards that will bring total compensation to $9 million. The highest-paid executive at Ally Financial will receive no cash salary in 2011 but can be granted performance-based stock awards worth $9.5 million. GM is headed by Chairman and CEO Dan Akerson, and Ally's CEO is Michael Carpenter.

AIG nearly went under during the 2008 financial crisis. It had written insurance on the value of hundreds of billions in mortgage investments held by financial institutions. When the investments lost value, AIG could not afford to make good on its contracts. It took government help to stay out of bankruptcy and received a bailout package with a total value of $182 billion. The government got a 92 percent stake in the company and hopes to start selling the shares soon to help recoup its money. The company also has been selling off assets to repay the aid.

Taxpayers provided a total of $49.5 billion to GM as it went through a bankruptcy reorganization in 2009.

The Treasury Department has trimmed its stake in GM to 26.5 percent of the company from 61 percent, when it sold $23.1 billion of GM stock at an initial public offering in November. Treasury will need to sell its remaining GM shares at an average price of $53 to break even on the bailout.

Ally, which is 74 percent owned by the government, announced this week that it is preparing an initial public stock offering as a way to repay a portion of the $17.2 billion in aid it received.

The highest-paid executive at Chrysler, Sergio Marchionne, who is head of both Chrysler and Italy's Fiat, is not affected by the pay restrictions because he receives his salary from Fiat. The pay czar's filing showed that the second-highest paid executive at Chrysler will receive $500,000 in cash salary this year and total compensation of $1.18 million.

The compensation decisions were announced by Patricia Geoghegan, who succeeded Kenneth Feinberg last September. Geoghegan, a tax and compensation lawyer, came to Treasury after retiring as a partner from the New York law firm of Cravath, Swaine and Moore.

Feinberg's departure last fall ended a contentious 14-month career as pay czar in which critics contended he had not done enough to reign in excessive salaries and bonuses at companies rescued by billions of dollars of taxpayer support. Feinberg now oversees a $20 billion fund created by BP PLC to compensate victims of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Feinberg argued that his efforts had laid the foundation for a new compensation system based on longterm performance.

In a final report, Feinberg recommended that future compensation decisions should place limits on guaranteed cash payments and require that pay packages have a significant performance component.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, one of Feinberg's most vocal critics, contended that Feinberg had not been tough enough in cracking down on the pay excesses on Wall Street that had contributed to the financial crisis by encouraging excessive risk-taking.

01 April 2011

Gives local governments more control over growth — while restricting state oversight

Growth bill begins Senate journey

MARCH 29 • A Senate committee on Monday passed a growth management package that continues restrictions on the levying of impact fees but gives local governments more control over growth — while restricting state oversight to more regional and statewide issues.

Over the concerns of environmental and smart growth groups, the Senate Community Affairs Committee approved SB 1122 by Chairman Mike Bennett (R-Bradenton) that wrests from state officials many development decisions such as schools and parks that would instead be handled at the local level. Bennett said the measure is intended to streamline the development process by cutting redundant requirements and giving local officials more authority to determine what their communities will look like.

proposal to shrink Citizens Property Insurance Corp. by raising premiums by as much as 25 percent a year and limiting the types of policies the state-run insurer can issue passed its first Senate hurdle Tuesday.

Senate takes up Citizens overhaul

MARCH 30 • A proposal to shrink Citizens Property Insurance Corp. by raising premiums by as much as 25 percent a year and limiting the types of policies the state-run insurer can issue passed its first Senate hurdle Tuesday.

Following debate and public testimony from residents who traveled from as far away as Key West, the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee approved SB 1714 on a 6-4 vote. Citizens is Florida’s largest property insurer with nearly 1.3 million policies.

The rate hikes are needed, backers say, because the state-run pool is charging rates that don’t nearly cover the risks, and the program is based on levying assessments on most insurance customers, a reliance the bill sponsor said is unsustainable and patently unfair.

“Socialism failed in Moscow,” said Sen. Alan Hays (R-Umatilla). “It’s going to fail in Miami and Orlando as well.”

The bill’s biggest critic, Sen. Mike Fasano (R-New Port Richey), said most coastal residents are living in areas where private insurers won’t go and if they did would have to charge rates that many property owners couldn’t afford.

“I’ve got people back home who cannot afford not to have Citizens,” Fasano said. “The industry has abandoned them. What do we tell those people?”

Beyond the rates hikes, which could not exceed a 20 percent statewide average, the bill would prevents Citizens from insuring homes valued at more than $1 million beginning Jan. 1, 2012. By 2016, the home must be valued at $500,000 or less to be eligible for Citizens coverage.

“It’s dead wrong to perpetuate the life of Citizens,” Hays said “We’ve got 85 percent of people of Florida on the hook so that 15 percent of citizens can have insurance.”

Among the other provisions, the bill:

• Prohibits the use of public adjusters for Citizens customers.
.
• Prohibits Citizens from offering commercial, non residential policies (about 8,377 policies now in force.)

• Restricts sinkhole coverage to the primary residence and not ancillary buildings.

• Prevents insurers from levying assessments on non-Citizens policies until policyholders within the pool
are charged a 15 percent surcharge to be paid upon renewal, termination and cancellation.
Citizens traces its roots back to 1992′s Hurricane Andrew, but was created in its current form in 2002 to cover coastal policyholders that private insurers wouldn’t touch. It typically charges rates below what private companies say they can charge.

Lawmakers in 2007 froze Citizens rates until Jan. 1 2010. Since then, rate hikes have been capped at a statewide average of 10 percent. The rates, even insurance officials agree, are actuarially unsound.

“What we tell those people is the truth,” Hays said. “We tell them it’s our fault. We have to take responsibility for the mess we’ve invented.”